Hillary Clinton & abortion. During the Obama years, democrats became more aggressive in its support of abortion. Hillary Clinton’s campaign reflects this new attitude. If she is elected, her administration is likely to reach a new extreme in the depth of its commitment to keeping abortion legal, expanding subsidies for it, and insulating these policies from democratic review.
During the last Presidential debates, Wallace asked Donald Trump whether he wanted the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, the historical case that protects a woman’s right to have an abortion. The GOP nominee said he would appoint conservative Supreme Court judges who might overturn it. “Well, if that would happen, because I am pro-life, and I will be appointing pro-life judges, I would think that that will go back to the individual states.”
Hillary Clinton Views On Abortion
In direct contrast, Hillary Clinton abortion response was all too real for the millions of women who have either had an abortion or know someone — a cousin, co-worker, sister, friend — who has.
“I strongly support Roe v. Wade, which guarantees a constitutional right to a woman to make the most intimate, most difficult in many cases, decisions about her health care that one can imagine,” Clinton said. “And in this case, it’s not only about Roe v. Wade. It is about what’s happening right now in America. So many states are putting very stringent regulations on women that block them from exercising that choice to the extent that they are defending Planned Parenthood. I will defend women’s rights to make their own healthcare decisions.”
Trump said, “If you go with what Hillary is saying in the ninth month you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby.”
This photo is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby called Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by a surgeon named Joseph Bruner.
The baby was detected with spina bifida and would not make it through if remand from the mom’s womb.
Little Samuel’s mom, Julie Armas, was an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She understood of Dr. Bruner’s remarkable surgery. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he carries out these unique operations while the infant is still in the womb. In the surgical treatment, a C-section removes the uterus, and the medical professional makes a little cut to operate on the infant.
That image must be shown on every TV broadcast and run in every paper in America.
It won’t be.
Why? Since it is a graphic pointer that growing in the womb is a child’ not a “glob of tissue,” or “item of conception.”
That pre-born child is a human being with all the feelings, will, and character of any person.
That photo says it in a way that a thousand words can not.
Little Samuel’s mom stated they “wept for days” when they saw the picture.
She stated, “The image is telling us my pregnancy is not about special needs or disease, it’s about a little individual.”
Samuel Alexander Arms was born on December 2, 1999
That’s what it’s always been about. That’s exactly what the Hillary Clinton desires us to forget.
Throughout surgical treatment on little Samuel, the little boy reached his small, however thoroughly established, hand through the cut and firmly grasped the surgeon’s finger. The picture caught the fantastic occasion with ideal clearness. The editors entitled the image, “Hand of Hope.” Text describing the image started, “The small hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Arms emerges from the mom’s uterus to comprehend the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the surgeon for the present of life.”
Samuel Alexander Arms in 2012
If you hold back from rescuing those taken away to death, those who go staggering to the slaughter; if you say, ‘Look, we did not know this’- does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who keeps watch over your soul know it? And will he not repay all according to their deeds?” Proverbs 24:11-12
More from YouTube on Hillary Clinton & Abortion